Nerman Fatic vs Andrey Chepelev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Sep at 08:39 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs A. Chepelev

BIH
2
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fatic 2 - 0 Chepelev
They have played 5 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 4 and Andrey Chepelev winning 1. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Andrey Chepelev was at the M25 Zlatibor, 27-09-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fatic | 2 |
| Chepelev | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(SF) M25 Zlatibor(09-27-25)
(Q3) Zagreb Challenger(05-09-22)
N. Fatic vs A. Chepelev H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $73,995 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.47% (404-287) | Career Total W/L | 60.41% (473-310) |
| 2 | Clay | 0 |
| 12 | Titles | 8 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Fatic vs A. Chepelev Match Preview:
- Second serve performance: Nerman Fatic has a slight advantage, winning 43.72% of second serve points compared to Andrey Chepelev's 40.22%. Is this a crucial factor? Historically, it has been a reliable predictor.
- Return game stats: Although Fatic wins 43.69% of opponents’ second serve points, Chepelev exceeds this with 47.66%. On first serve returns, Chepelev leads with 30.68% over Fatic's 28.94%.
- Under pressure performance: Fatic shows resilience with 55.52% of breakpoints saved compared to Chepelev’s 51.79%. Does this give him an edge in tight situations?
- Performance overview: Over the last year, Fatic has an impressive win rate of 75.76%, considerably higher than Chepelev's 61.54%.
- Best surface: Both players have their best results on clay, with a 61% win percentage. Their worst surfaces differ, with Fatic struggling on grass and Chepelev on indoor hard courts.
- Player level: Fatic predominantly plays at Challengers/ITF level tournaments and has a higher win percentage compared to Chepelev’s performance at Futures/Satellites level.
- Direct H2H matches: Fatic leads their head-to-head, having won their only match against Chepelev in three sets.
- Opponent quality: Fatic generally competes against tougher opponents, with an average opponent rank of 355.83 compared to Chepelev's 485.01.
- Deciding set performance: Fatic is formidable in decisive moments, winning 94% of deciding sets in the past year, far surpassing Chepelev’s 59% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (September 27, 2025, UTC):
Nerman Fatic's stronger performance on second serves and under pressure suggests a competitive edge in upcoming rallies. His superior win rate over the past year further strengthens his case.
However, Andrey Chepelev's advantage in return game points, especially on first serves, indicates that Fatic might face challenges in his service games.
Fatic's advantage in direct head-to-head matches and experience against tougher opponents provide additional confidence in his ability to overcome Chepelev.
Considering these factors—and particularly Fatic's dominance in deciding sets—it appears that Nerman Fatic is the most likely candidate to emerge victorious in this match-up.
Nerman Fatic vs Andrey Chepelev Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Fatic vs A. Chepelev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 26 | Games Won | 17 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:0:7 | Average Match Time | 2:0:7 |
| 63% (89/142) | 1st Serve % | 76% (103/136) |
| 69% (61/89) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (59/103) |
| 53% (28/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (15/33) |
| 50% (9/18) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (4/13) |
| 46% (62/136) | Return Points Win % | 37% (53/142) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-6 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
A. Chepelev Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 6-3 2-6 7-6(2) | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(4) 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 7-6(6) | ||
QF | L | 6-4 7-6(5) | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||

N. Fatic vs A. Chepelev Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.47% (404/287) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.41% (473/310) |
| 57.49% (890/658) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.22% (1034/742) |
| 53.03% (7602/6734) | Games Win/Loss | 53.32% (8744/7654) |
| 51.19% (43/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 38.10% (8/13) |
| 61.00% (341/218) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.32% (463/292) |
| 43.48% (20/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1598 | Aces Total | 545 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1517 | Total Double Faults | 1743 |
| 1:20:1 | Average Match Time | 1:25:21 |
| 509.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 447.33 |
| 66% (23791/35820) | 1st Serve % | 69% (27258/39398) |
| 65% (15579/23791) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (17052/27258) |
| 48% (5772/12029) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5953/12139) |
| 47% (1969/4222) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2084/4493) |
| 43% (15618/36165) | Return Points Win % | 43% (17199/39754) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (3/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 52.89% (119/106) | Challenger W/L | 53.33% (40/35) |
| 63.24% (277/161) | Futures W/L | 61.24% (433/274) |
| 60% (394/662) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (462/771) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (8/8) |
| 51% (79/156) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (101/184) |
| 54% (102/189) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (116/206) |
| 88% (394/348) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (441/402) |
| 11% (394/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (441/39) |
| 19% (297/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (342/72) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Betting Tips & Picks November 28, 2025

Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Alafia Ayeni Prediction – ATP Temuco Challenger – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
